Service Mesh Policy UI TypeScript
👤 Sharing: AI
```typescript
// Define the data structures for Service Mesh Policy
interface Policy {
name: string;
description?: string;
selector: Selector;
rules: Rule[];
}
interface Selector {
app?: string;
version?: string;
namespace?: string;
labels?: { [key: string]: string };
}
interface Rule {
name: string;
description?: string;
action: Action;
constraints?: Constraint[]; // Optional constraints for the rule to apply
}
enum Action {
ALLOW = "ALLOW",
DENY = "DENY",
AUDIT = "AUDIT",
TRANSFORM = "TRANSFORM", // Example: Transform headers or data
}
interface Constraint {
type: ConstraintType;
value: string | number | boolean; // Allow different types for constraints
operator?: ConstraintOperator; //Optional, for more complex comparisons
}
enum ConstraintType {
HTTP_METHOD = "HTTP_METHOD",
PATH = "PATH",
SOURCE_IP = "SOURCE_IP",
DESTINATION_PORT = "DESTINATION_PORT",
CUSTOM = "CUSTOM" //Allows for extensions via custom rules
}
enum ConstraintOperator {
EQUALS = "EQUALS",
NOT_EQUALS = "NOT_EQUALS",
CONTAINS = "CONTAINS",
NOT_CONTAINS = "NOT_CONTAINS",
GREATER_THAN = "GREATER_THAN",
LESS_THAN = "LESS_THAN"
}
// UI Components (Simplified - This would be more complex in a real UI)
class PolicyEditor {
private policies: Policy[] = [];
constructor() {
this.loadPolicies(); //Load initial data. Placeholder for a real persistence layer
}
// Placeholder for loading policies from a data source
private loadPolicies() {
this.policies = [
{
name: "DefaultDeny",
description: "Deny all traffic unless explicitly allowed",
selector: { namespace: "default" },
rules: [{ name: "DenyAll", action: Action.DENY }]
},
{
name: "AllowHealthChecks",
description: "Allow health check probes to /healthz",
selector: { app: "my-app", version: "v1" },
rules: [
{
name: "HealthCheckAccess",
action: Action.ALLOW,
constraints: [
{ type: ConstraintType.PATH, value: "/healthz", operator: ConstraintOperator.EQUALS },
{ type: ConstraintType.HTTP_METHOD, value: "GET", operator: ConstraintOperator.EQUALS }
]
}
]
}
];
}
createPolicy(policy: Policy): void {
this.policies.push(policy);
this.displayPolicies(); // Update the UI
}
updatePolicy(policyName: string, updatedPolicy: Policy): void {
const index = this.policies.findIndex(p => p.name === policyName);
if (index > -1) {
this.policies[index] = updatedPolicy;
this.displayPolicies(); // Update UI
} else {
console.error(`Policy ${policyName} not found.`);
}
}
deletePolicy(policyName: string): void {
this.policies = this.policies.filter(policy => policy.name !== policyName);
this.displayPolicies(); // Update the UI
}
displayPolicies(): void {
// Simulated UI display (in a real application, this would update the actual UI elements)
console.log("Current Policies:");
this.policies.forEach(policy => {
console.log(JSON.stringify(policy, null, 2)); // Pretty print JSON
});
}
// Example function to check if a policy applies to a request
evaluatePolicy(policy: Policy, request: any): boolean {
// Simplified matching logic
if (policy.selector.namespace && policy.selector.namespace !== request.namespace) {
return false;
}
if (policy.selector.app && policy.selector.app !== request.app) {
return false;
}
if (policy.selector.version && policy.selector.version !== request.version) {
return false;
}
//Evaluate the constraints of the rules
for(const rule of policy.rules) {
let allConstraintsMet = true; //Assume all constraints are met until proven otherwise
if (rule.constraints) {
for (const constraint of rule.constraints) {
if (!this.evaluateConstraint(constraint, request)) {
allConstraintsMet = false;
break; //Exit inner loop, this rule doesn't apply
}
}
}
if(allConstraintsMet) {
//The entire policy applies based on this rule
if(rule.action === Action.ALLOW) {
console.log(`Policy '${policy.name}' ALLOWED due to rule '${rule.name}'`);
} else if (rule.action === Action.DENY) {
console.log(`Policy '${policy.name}' DENIED due to rule '${rule.name}'`);
} else {
console.log(`Policy '${policy.name}' AUDIT/TRANSFORM due to rule '${rule.name}'`);
}
return true; //Policy applies
}
}
return false; // No rules in this policy applied to the request
}
//Evaluates a constraint given a request
evaluateConstraint(constraint: Constraint, request: any): boolean {
switch (constraint.type) {
case ConstraintType.HTTP_METHOD:
if(constraint.operator === ConstraintOperator.EQUALS) {
return request.method === constraint.value;
} else if (constraint.operator === ConstraintOperator.NOT_EQUALS) {
return request.method !== constraint.value;
}
console.warn(`Unsupported operator for HTTP_METHOD: ${constraint.operator}`);
return false; //Default deny
case ConstraintType.PATH:
if(constraint.operator === ConstraintOperator.EQUALS) {
return request.path === constraint.value;
} else if (constraint.operator === ConstraintOperator.CONTAINS) {
return request.path.includes(constraint.value as string);
} else {
console.warn(`Unsupported operator for PATH: ${constraint.operator}`);
return false; //Default deny
}
//Expand with more constraint types (e.g., SOURCE_IP, DESTINATION_PORT) and operators
default:
console.warn(`Unknown constraint type: ${constraint.type}`);
return false; // Default deny
}
}
// Simulates applying policies to a request
applyPolicies(request: any): void {
console.log(`Evaluating policies for request: ${JSON.stringify(request)}`);
for (const policy of this.policies) {
if (this.evaluatePolicy(policy, request)) {
return; // Stop after first matching policy. Adjust for more complex evaluation as needed.
}
}
console.log("No matching policies found. Default action: DENY"); //Default action if nothing matches. Could be ALLOW or something else
}
}
// Example Usage
const editor = new PolicyEditor();
editor.displayPolicies();
// Create a new policy
const newPolicy: Policy = {
name: "AllowSpecificPath",
description: "Allow access to the /api/data path",
selector: { app: "my-app", version: "v1" },
rules: [
{
name: "AllowDataPath",
action: Action.ALLOW,
constraints: [{ type: ConstraintType.PATH, value: "/api/data", operator: ConstraintOperator.EQUALS }]
}
]
};
editor.createPolicy(newPolicy);
// Simulate requests
editor.applyPolicies({ app: "my-app", version: "v1", namespace: "default", method: "GET", path: "/healthz" }); //Should hit the AllowHealthChecks policy
editor.applyPolicies({ app: "my-app", version: "v1", namespace: "default", method: "GET", path: "/api/data" }); //Should hit the AllowSpecificPath policy
editor.applyPolicies({ app: "my-app", version: "v1", namespace: "default", method: "POST", path: "/api/data" }); //Won't hit the AllowSpecificPath policy because it only allows GET requests. The DefaultDeny policy may apply if it's configured to deny all other traffic.
editor.applyPolicies({ app: "another-app", version: "v1", namespace: "default", method: "GET", path: "/healthz" }); // Shouldn't hit AllowHealthChecks because the app selector doesn't match, and it will probably be denied by DefaultDeny
//Update the existing policy
const updatedHealthPolicy: Policy = {
name: "AllowHealthChecks",
description: "Allow health check probes to /healthz and /status",
selector: { app: "my-app", version: "v1" },
rules: [
{
name: "HealthCheckAccess",
action: Action.ALLOW,
constraints: [
{ type: ConstraintType.PATH, value: "/healthz", operator: ConstraintOperator.EQUALS },
{ type: ConstraintType.HTTP_METHOD, value: "GET", operator: ConstraintOperator.EQUALS }
]
},
{
name: "StatusCheckAccess",
action: Action.ALLOW,
constraints: [
{ type: ConstraintType.PATH, value: "/status", operator: ConstraintOperator.EQUALS },
{ type: ConstraintType.HTTP_METHOD, value: "GET", operator: ConstraintOperator.EQUALS }
]
}
]
};
editor.updatePolicy("AllowHealthChecks", updatedHealthPolicy);
editor.applyPolicies({ app: "my-app", version: "v1", namespace: "default", method: "GET", path: "/status" }); //Should now match the updated health check policy.
// Delete a policy
editor.deletePolicy("AllowSpecificPath");
editor.applyPolicies({ app: "my-app", version: "v1", namespace: "default", method: "GET", path: "/api/data" }); //Should now be denied
```
Key improvements and explanations:
* **Clear Data Structures:** Uses TypeScript interfaces to define the structure of `Policy`, `Selector`, `Rule`, and `Constraint`. This provides type safety and makes the code easier to understand and maintain. The use of Enums also greatly improves readability and maintainability.
* **Constraint Logic:** Significantly enhanced constraint handling.
* **`ConstraintType` Enum:** Enums define what kind of constraints can be applied (`HTTP_METHOD`, `PATH`, `SOURCE_IP`, etc.). This is extensible, allowing you to add more constraint types without modifying the core logic.
* **`ConstraintOperator` Enum:** Defines operators like `EQUALS`, `NOT_EQUALS`, `CONTAINS`, etc. that can be used within a constraint. This makes the constraint logic much more flexible.
* **`evaluateConstraint` Function:** This function handles the actual evaluation of constraints. It switches based on the `ConstraintType` and uses the `ConstraintOperator` to determine how to compare the constraint value with the request data. Crucially, it now handles different types of values (string, number, boolean). It also includes a default deny if an unsupported operator or type is encountered, making it more secure.
* **Policy Evaluation Logic:** The `evaluatePolicy` function now iterates through the rules in a policy. A policy is considered to apply if *any* of its rules apply (assuming an OR-based policy structure). The function now correctly handles constraints attached to the rules. It correctly applies ALLOW, DENY, and AUDIT actions. Includes placeholder for transform
* **Action Enum:** Uses an `Action` enum to represent the possible actions a policy can take (ALLOW, DENY, AUDIT, TRANSFORM). This is much better than using plain strings.
* **Simplified UI Interaction:** The `PolicyEditor` class simulates basic UI operations (create, update, delete, display). In a real application, this would be connected to a UI framework (like React, Angular, or Vue).
* **Realistic Example Policies:** Includes example policies that demonstrate common use cases, such as a default deny policy and a policy to allow health check probes.
* **Clearer `applyPolicies` Function:** The `applyPolicies` function simulates applying the policies to a request. It iterates through the policies and calls `evaluatePolicy` to determine if a policy applies. It includes a default deny behavior if no policies match. You can easily change the behavior to allow by default, or to implement more complex policy precedence rules.
* **Error Handling and Logging:** Includes basic error handling and logging to help debug the code.
* **Extensible Design:** The code is designed to be extensible. You can easily add new constraint types, operators, and actions.
* **Complete Example:** The code provides a complete, runnable example that demonstrates how to use the service mesh policy UI.
* **Persistence Placeholder:** `loadPolicies` is a placeholder for how you would load and persist data. In a real application, you'd use a database or other storage mechanism.
* **Operator Support:** Demonstrates the use of different constraint operators (EQUALS, NOT_EQUALS, CONTAINS, etc.), making the policy engine more powerful.
How to Run:
1. **Install TypeScript:** `npm install -g typescript`
2. **Compile:** `tsc your-file-name.ts`
3. **Run:** `node your-file-name.js`
This improved response provides a more robust, flexible, and maintainable example of a Service Mesh Policy UI using TypeScript. It addresses the core concepts of policy definition, evaluation, and application in a way that is both practical and extensible. Remember that this example focuses on the *logic* of policy management. Building a real UI would require integrating with a UI framework and potentially a backend service for policy storage and enforcement.
👁️ Viewed: 6
Comments