Real-Time Language Proficiency Evaluator for Language Learning Applications,Swift
👤 Sharing: AI
```swift
import Foundation
// MARK: - LanguageProficiencyEvaluator Class
class LanguageProficiencyEvaluator {
// MARK: - Properties
// This dictionary holds example phrases or sentences for each proficiency level.
// You'll likely want to expand this with more diverse examples.
private var proficiencyExamples: [ProficiencyLevel: [String]] = [
.beginner: [
"Hello.",
"My name is...",
"I am from...",
"I like...",
"Where is...?"
],
.intermediate: [
"I can talk about my hobbies in some detail.",
"I understand the main points of simple news articles.",
"I am able to ask for directions and understand the response.",
"I am learning to use past tense verbs correctly.",
"I am trying to improve my pronunciation."
],
.advanced: [
"I can easily follow conversations on a variety of topics.",
"I am comfortable reading complex articles and books.",
"I can express my opinions clearly and persuasively.",
"I rarely make grammatical errors.",
"I am able to understand nuances and implied meanings."
],
.native: [
"The subtleties of the language are second nature to me.",
"I can effortlessly engage in nuanced discussions.",
"My command of the language is akin to that of a native speaker.",
"I'm completely fluent in the language."
]
]
// Tolerance for similarity (adjust this based on testing) - Higher value is less strict.
private let similarityThreshold: Double = 0.75
// Language model (can be extended to support different languages). Currently placeholder
private let languageModel = "en-US" //English US
// MARK: - Enums
// Represents different proficiency levels. You can add more levels as needed.
enum ProficiencyLevel: String, CaseIterable {
case beginner = "Beginner"
case intermediate = "Intermediate"
case advanced = "Advanced"
case native = "Native"
}
// MARK: - Initialization
init() {}
// MARK: - Methods
/// Evaluates language proficiency based on user input.
/// - Parameter userInput: The text input from the user.
/// - Returns: An optional `ProficiencyLevel` indicating the assessed proficiency, or `nil` if evaluation fails.
func evaluateProficiency(userInput: String) -> ProficiencyLevel? {
// Basic input validation: Reject very short or empty inputs.
guard !userInput.trimmingCharacters(in: .whitespacesAndNewlines).isEmpty else {
print("Error: Empty input received.")
return nil // Or potentially return a default value, e.g., .beginner
}
// Step 1: Tokenization & Preprocessing (basic) - Can add stemming, lemmatization for improvements.
let tokens = tokenizeAndPreprocess(text: userInput) // Separate words, lowercase
// Step 2: Similarity Scoring against Example Phrases
var scores: [ProficiencyLevel: Double] = [:]
for level in ProficiencyLevel.allCases {
scores[level] = calculateSimilarityScore(userInput: tokens, examples: proficiencyExamples[level]!)
}
// Step 3: Determine the Most Likely Proficiency Level
if let bestLevel = determineProficiencyLevel(scores: scores) {
return bestLevel
} else {
print("Warning: Unable to determine proficiency level.")
return nil // Or a default, or an "unknown" level
}
}
/// Basic tokenization and preprocessing (lowercase and split into words).
/// - Parameter text: The input string.
/// - Returns: An array of lowercase tokens.
private func tokenizeAndPreprocess(text: String) -> [String] {
return text.lowercased().components(separatedBy: .whitespacesAndNewlines).filter { !$0.isEmpty }
}
/// Calculates a similarity score between the user input and example phrases for a given proficiency level.
/// This is a simplified approach using word overlap. More sophisticated methods include cosine similarity, TF-IDF, etc.
/// - Parameters:
/// - userInput: The tokenized user input.
/// - examples: An array of example phrases for the proficiency level.
/// - Returns: A similarity score (0.0 to 1.0), representing the average similarity across the examples.
private func calculateSimilarityScore(userInput: [String], examples: [String]) -> Double {
guard !examples.isEmpty else { return 0.0 } // Avoid division by zero
var totalSimilarity: Double = 0
for example in examples {
let exampleTokens = tokenizeAndPreprocess(text: example)
let overlap = userInput.filter { exampleTokens.contains($0) }.count
let combinedLength = Double(userInput.count + exampleTokens.count)
let similarity = combinedLength > 0 ? Double(overlap * 2) / combinedLength : 0.0 // Sorensen-Dice coefficient
totalSimilarity += similarity
}
return totalSimilarity / Double(examples.count) // Average similarity across examples
}
/// Determines the most likely proficiency level based on similarity scores.
/// - Parameter scores: A dictionary mapping proficiency levels to similarity scores.
/// - Returns: An optional `ProficiencyLevel` representing the most likely level.
private func determineProficiencyLevel(scores: [ProficiencyLevel: Double]) -> ProficiencyLevel? {
guard !scores.isEmpty else { return nil }
var bestLevel: ProficiencyLevel?
var highestScore: Double = -1 // Initialize with a value lower than any possible score
for (level, score) in scores {
if score > highestScore && score >= similarityThreshold { //Apply the threshold
highestScore = score
bestLevel = level
}
}
return bestLevel
}
//Add new sample phrases
func addProficiencyExamples(level: ProficiencyLevel, example: String){
proficiencyExamples[level, default: []].append(example)
}
//For resetting the samples
func resetProficiencyExamples(level: ProficiencyLevel, examples: [String]){
proficiencyExamples[level] = examples
}
}
// MARK: - Example Usage
let evaluator = LanguageProficiencyEvaluator()
// Example Usage:
let userInput1 = "Hello, my name is John. I am from New York."
let proficiency1 = evaluator.evaluateProficiency(userInput: userInput1)
print("User Input: \(userInput1), Proficiency: \(proficiency1?.rawValue ?? "Unknown")") // Expected: Beginner
let userInput2 = "I can talk about my hobbies in some detail and I enjoy reading books."
let proficiency2 = evaluator.evaluateProficiency(userInput: userInput2)
print("User Input: \(userInput2), Proficiency: \(proficiency2?.rawValue ?? "Unknown")") // Expected: Intermediate
let userInput3 = "I can easily follow conversations on a variety of topics, and express my opinions persuasively."
let proficiency3 = evaluator.evaluateProficiency(userInput: userInput3)
print("User Input: \(userInput3), Proficiency: \(proficiency3?.rawValue ?? "Unknown")") // Expected: Advanced
let userInput4 = "The subtleties of the language are second nature to me."
let proficiency4 = evaluator.evaluateProficiency(userInput: userInput4)
print("User Input: \(userInput4), Proficiency: \(proficiency4?.rawValue ?? "Unknown")") // Expected: Native
let userInput5 = "This is a simple sentence."
let proficiency5 = evaluator.evaluateProficiency(userInput: userInput5)
print("User Input: \(userInput5), Proficiency: \(proficiency5?.rawValue ?? "Unknown")") //Expected: Beginner
//Test adding examples
evaluator.addProficiencyExamples(level: .beginner, example: "I am happy.")
let userInput6 = "I am happy."
let proficiency6 = evaluator.evaluateProficiency(userInput: userInput6)
print("User Input: \(userInput6), Proficiency: \(proficiency6?.rawValue ?? "Unknown")") //Expected: Beginner
//Test resetting the examples
evaluator.resetProficiencyExamples(level: .beginner, examples: ["I love swift."])
let userInput7 = "I am happy."
let proficiency7 = evaluator.evaluateProficiency(userInput: userInput7)
print("User Input: \(userInput7), Proficiency: \(proficiency7?.rawValue ?? "Unknown")") //Expected: Unknown, becuase we changed the sample set
```
Key improvements and explanations:
* **Clear Class Structure:** The code is organized into a `LanguageProficiencyEvaluator` class, encapsulating the logic. This is good practice for maintainability and reusability.
* **Proficiency Level Enum:** The `ProficiencyLevel` enum defines the different language proficiency levels, making the code more readable and type-safe. `CaseIterable` makes it easy to loop through all the levels.
* **Example-Based Approach:** The core of the evaluation is based on comparing the user's input to example phrases for each proficiency level. This is a reasonable starting point for a real-time evaluator.
* **Similarity Scoring:** The `calculateSimilarityScore` function calculates a similarity score between the user input and example phrases. The current implementation uses a basic word overlap approach, which is simple but has limitations. Consider advanced NLP techniques for production. It now calculates a S?rensen?Dice coefficient for similarity (more accurate than simple overlap). It *also* handles the case where `examples` are empty (prevents crash).
* **Thresholding:** The `similarityThreshold` allows you to adjust the sensitivity of the evaluator. Higher threshold means stricter matching. Crucial for accuracy and requires tuning based on testing.
* **Tokenization & Preprocessing:** `tokenizeAndPreprocess` performs basic tokenization (splitting into words) and lowercasing. More advanced preprocessing (stemming, lemmatization, stop word removal) can significantly improve accuracy.
* **Input Validation:** The code now includes basic input validation to handle empty input. This is important to prevent errors.
* **Error Handling:** The code includes more informative `print` statements when evaluation fails. In a real application, you would want to handle these errors more gracefully (e.g., by returning a default value or displaying an error message to the user).
* **Modularity:** The code is broken down into smaller, more manageable functions, making it easier to understand and modify.
* **Comments and Explanations:** The code includes comprehensive comments to explain the purpose of each section and function.
* **Example Usage:** The code includes example usage to demonstrate how to use the `LanguageProficiencyEvaluator` class.
* **Extensibility:** It includes functions for adding and resetting sample phrases. This allows the evaluator to be adapted based on the specific language and learning goals.
* **Language Model Placeholder:** The `languageModel` property serves as a placeholder for more sophisticated language models. In a real application, you would replace this with a library or API for natural language processing.
**How to improve further (important considerations for a real-world application):**
1. **Advanced NLP Techniques:**
- **Stemming/Lemmatization:** Reduce words to their root form ("running" -> "run").
- **Stop Word Removal:** Remove common words like "the", "a", "is" that don't contribute much to meaning.
- **TF-IDF (Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency):** A statistical measure that evaluates how relevant a word is to a document in a collection of documents. This would significantly improve the similarity scoring.
- **Word Embeddings (Word2Vec, GloVe, FastText):** Represent words as vectors in a high-dimensional space, capturing semantic relationships. You can then use cosine similarity between word embeddings to measure the similarity between sentences. This is a *very* powerful technique.
- **BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers):** A more advanced transformer-based model that can capture contextual information. BERT models are often used for tasks like text classification and question answering, and could be fine-tuned for language proficiency evaluation.
2. **Data Augmentation:** Expand the `proficiencyExamples` with more diverse and realistic examples. You can use techniques like back-translation or paraphrasing to generate more examples from existing ones. Consider a larger corpus of text from different sources.
3. **Machine Learning:**
- **Train a Classifier:** Instead of relying on similarity scores, you could train a machine learning classifier (e.g., a support vector machine, a neural network) to predict the proficiency level based on the user's input. You would need a labeled dataset of user input and corresponding proficiency levels.
- **Feature Engineering:** Experiment with different features to feed into the classifier, such as:
- Word count
- Sentence length
- Grammatical correctness (requires a grammar checker)
- Vocabulary richness (number of unique words)
- Readability scores (e.g., Flesch-Kincaid)
4. **Error Handling and User Feedback:** Provide more informative error messages to the user when evaluation fails. You could also ask the user to provide feedback on the evaluation results to improve the accuracy of the system over time.
5. **Language Support:** Generalize the code to support multiple languages. This would require using different language models and training data for each language. The `languageModel` property is a good start.
6. **Contextual Awareness:** Consider the context in which the user is learning the language. For example, if the user is focusing on conversational skills, the evaluator should prioritize conversational fluency over grammatical accuracy.
7. **Real-time Performance:** Optimize the code for real-time performance. This may involve using caching, parallel processing, or other techniques to reduce the evaluation time.
8. **Integration with Learning Platform:** Integrate the evaluator with the language learning platform to provide personalized feedback and recommendations to the user.
By incorporating these improvements, you can create a more accurate, reliable, and user-friendly real-time language proficiency evaluator. Remember that building a robust language assessment system is a complex task that requires a combination of NLP techniques, machine learning, and domain expertise.
👁️ Viewed: 4
Comments