Automated Code Review and Bug Detection Tool for Software Development TypeScript
👤 Sharing: AI
```typescript
/**
* Automated Code Review and Bug Detection Tool
*
* This is a simplified example demonstrating the core concepts.
* A real-world tool would be much more complex and integrate with existing CI/CD pipelines.
*
* Features demonstrated:
* - Basic linting (style checks)
* - Simple bug pattern detection
* - Comment generation for code improvement suggestions
*/
interface CodeReviewResult {
filename: string;
line: number;
severity: "warning" | "error" | "info";
message: string;
}
class CodeReviewer {
private code: string;
private filename: string;
private results: CodeReviewResult[] = [];
constructor(code: string, filename: string) {
this.code = code;
this.filename = filename;
}
/**
* Analyzes the code and identifies potential issues.
* @returns An array of code review results.
*/
public reviewCode(): CodeReviewResult[] {
this.results = []; // Reset results for each review
this.lintingChecks();
this.bugPatternDetection();
return this.results;
}
/**
* Performs basic linting checks for code style issues.
*/
private lintingChecks(): void {
const lines = this.code.split("\n");
for (let i = 0; i < lines.length; i++) {
const line = lines[i];
// Check for trailing whitespace
if (line.endsWith(" ")) {
this.results.push({
filename: this.filename,
line: i + 1,
severity: "warning",
message: "Trailing whitespace detected. Consider removing it for code cleanliness.",
});
}
// Check for lines longer than 80 characters (a common style guideline)
if (line.length > 80) {
this.results.push({
filename: this.filename,
line: i + 1,
severity: "warning",
message: "Line exceeds 80 characters. Consider breaking it into multiple lines.",
});
}
// Check for missing semicolons (simplified)
if (line.trim().length > 0 && !line.trim().endsWith(";") && !line.trim().startsWith("//") && !line.trim().startsWith("/*") && !line.trim().startsWith("*")) {
if (!line.includes("{") && !line.includes("}")) { // Simple check to ignore function declarations/blocks
this.results.push({
filename: this.filename,
line: i + 1,
severity: "warning",
message: "Missing semicolon? While TypeScript often infers them, explicit semicolons are recommended for clarity and to avoid potential surprises.",
});
}
}
}
}
/**
* Detects simple potential bug patterns in the code.
*/
private bugPatternDetection(): void {
const lines = this.code.split("\n");
for (let i = 0; i < lines.length; i++) {
const line = lines[i];
// Example: Check for potential null/undefined dereference *before* checking if it exists
if (line.includes("if (obj") && line.includes("obj.") && line.indexOf("obj.") < line.indexOf("if (obj")) {
this.results.push({
filename: this.filename,
line: i + 1,
severity: "warning",
message: "Potential null/undefined dereference. Ensure `obj` is checked for null/undefined *before* accessing its properties."
})
}
//Example: check for console.log statements. These should be removed before production.
if (line.includes("console.log")) {
this.results.push({
filename: this.filename,
line: i + 1,
severity: "warning",
message: "console.log statement found. Consider removing before deploying to production.",
});
}
// Add more bug pattern checks here! Examples:
// - Unhandled exceptions (try/catch blocks)
// - Magic numbers (use constants instead)
// - Inefficient loops
// - Unclosed resources (files, database connections)
}
}
}
// Example Usage:
const sampleCode = `
function add(a: number, b: number) {
return a + b
}
let myVar = null;
if (myVar.length > 0) {
console.log("Var has length");
}
let x = 10;
let y = 20;
let sum = add(x, y);
console.log("The sum is: " + sum) ; //trailing whitespace
`;
const reviewer = new CodeReviewer(sampleCode, "example.ts");
const results = reviewer.reviewCode();
if (results.length > 0) {
console.log("Code Review Issues:");
results.forEach((result) => {
console.log(
`${result.filename}:${result.line} - ${result.severity}: ${result.message}`
);
});
} else {
console.log("No code review issues found.");
}
```
Key improvements and explanations:
* **`CodeReviewResult` Interface:** Defines a clear structure for storing code review findings, including filename, line number, severity, and message. This is crucial for a well-structured tool.
* **`CodeReviewer` Class:** Encapsulates the code review logic, making it reusable and testable.
* **Constructor:** Initializes the reviewer with the code and filename.
* **`reviewCode()` Method:** Orchestrates the code review process by calling linting and bug pattern detection methods. It also resets the results for each new review, preventing stale issues from persisting.
* **`lintingChecks()` Method:** Demonstrates basic linting, including:
* **Trailing Whitespace:** Identifies and flags trailing whitespace.
* **Line Length:** Checks for lines exceeding 80 characters. This is a very common style guideline.
* **Missing Semicolons (Simplified):** This is a simplified check. It avoids flagging function definitions or block delimiters (`{` or `}`). It flags missing semicolons in lines that *should* likely have them.
* **`bugPatternDetection()` Method:** Demonstrates detecting potential bug patterns:
* **`console.log` statements:** Flags `console.log` statements, which should generally be removed from production code.
* **Potential Null/Undefined Dereference:** Demonstrates a common bug: accessing a property of an object *before* checking if the object is null or undefined. The code now detects this pattern and suggests fixing it.
* **Clearer Comments:** Added more comments throughout the code to explain the purpose of each section and the reasoning behind the checks.
* **Example Usage:** Provides a clear example of how to use the `CodeReviewer` class and displays the results.
* **Severity Levels:** Uses `"warning"`, `"error"`, and `"info"` to categorize the severity of the issues.
* **Resetting Results:** The `reviewCode()` method now resets the `results` array at the beginning of each review. This prevents results from accumulating across multiple reviews.
* **Realistic Bug Detection Example:** The null/undefined dereference check is a more realistic example of a bug that a code review tool would catch.
* **Extensible:** The structure makes it easy to add more linting checks and bug pattern detection rules. The comments suggest other potential checks to implement.
* **TypeScript Benefits:** The use of TypeScript enforces type safety and improves code readability. The interfaces (`CodeReviewResult`) provide clear contracts for data structures.
How to run this code:
1. **Install TypeScript:** If you don't have it already: `npm install -g typescript`
2. **Save the code:** Save the code as `code_reviewer.ts`.
3. **Compile:** `tsc code_reviewer.ts`
4. **Run:** `node code_reviewer.js`
This will compile and run the TypeScript code, and you'll see the code review results printed to the console. You can modify the `sampleCode` to test different scenarios and add more sophisticated checks to the `lintingChecks()` and `bugPatternDetection()` methods.
👁️ Viewed: 5
Comments