AI driven demand response and load balancing for energy grids Scala
👤 Sharing: AI
```scala
import scala.util.Random
import scala.collection.mutable
object AIDemandResponse {
// Define a simplified energy grid with nodes and their load capacities
case class GridNode(id: Int, maxCapacity: Double, var currentLoad: Double)
// Simulate a consumer with variable energy demand
case class Consumer(id: Int, baseDemand: Double, volatility: Double) {
def getDemand(): Double = {
// Demand fluctuates based on base demand and volatility, with a bit of randomness
baseDemand + (Random.nextDouble() * volatility * 2 - volatility) // Volatility around baseDemand
}
}
// "AI" - In this simplified example, the AI is a simple rule-based system.
// In a real application, this would be replaced by a machine learning model.
object AIController {
// Method to analyze grid state and recommend load adjustments
def analyzeAndRecommend(grid: mutable.Map[Int, GridNode], consumers: List[Consumer]): Map[Int, Double] = {
println("\nAnalyzing grid state...")
val totalLoad = grid.values.map(_.currentLoad).sum
val totalCapacity = grid.values.map(_.maxCapacity).sum
println(s"Total current load: ${totalLoad}")
println(s"Total grid capacity: ${totalCapacity}")
// Check for potential overload and imbalances
if (totalLoad > totalCapacity * 0.9) { // Trigger when load exceeds 90% of capacity
println("Warning: Grid nearing overload!")
// Identify nodes with high loads
val overloadedNodes = grid.filter { case (_, node) => node.currentLoad > node.maxCapacity * 0.8 } // Nodes > 80%
println(s"Overloaded nodes: ${overloadedNodes.keys.mkString(", ")}")
// Suggest load reductions for consumers proportionally based on their demand
val totalConsumerDemand = consumers.map(_.getDemand()).sum
val recommendedReductions = consumers.map(consumer => {
val reductionAmount = (totalLoad - totalCapacity) * (consumer.getDemand() / totalConsumerDemand)
(consumer.id, Math.max(0.0, reductionAmount)) // Ensure reduction is not negative
}).toMap
println("Recommending load reductions to consumers:")
recommendedReductions.foreach { case (consumerId, reduction) =>
println(s"Consumer ${consumerId}: Reduce by ${reduction}")
}
recommendedReductions
} else {
println("Grid is operating within safe limits.")
Map.empty[Int, Double] // No recommendations
}
}
}
def main(args: Array[String]): Unit = {
// Initialize the energy grid
val grid = mutable.Map(
1 -> GridNode(1, 100.0, 0.0),
2 -> GridNode(2, 80.0, 0.0),
3 -> GridNode(3, 120.0, 0.0)
)
// Initialize consumers
val consumers = List(
Consumer(1, 20.0, 5.0),
Consumer(2, 30.0, 8.0),
Consumer(3, 15.0, 3.0),
Consumer(4, 25.0, 6.0)
)
// Simulate a time step
println("Simulating a time step...")
// Update grid load based on consumer demand
consumers.foreach(consumer => {
val demand = consumer.getDemand()
val nodeId = (consumer.id % grid.size) + 1 // Assign consumers to nodes in a round-robin fashion
grid(nodeId).currentLoad += demand
println(s"Consumer ${consumer.id} consumed ${demand} energy, added to Node ${nodeId}")
})
// Display current load on each node
grid.foreach { case (nodeId, node) =>
println(s"Node ${nodeId}: Current load = ${node.currentLoad}, Max Capacity = ${node.maxCapacity}")
}
// Analyze and apply demand response recommendations
val recommendations = AIController.analyzeAndRecommend(grid, consumers)
// Apply the recommended load reductions (in a real system, this would be communicated to consumers)
recommendations.foreach { case (consumerId, reduction) =>
val nodeId = (consumerId % grid.size) + 1
//Simulate reduction by subtracting from the load
grid(nodeId).currentLoad -= reduction
println(s"Consumer ${consumerId} reduced load by ${reduction}, Node ${nodeId} load adjusted.")
}
// Display updated load
println("\nUpdated grid state after demand response:")
grid.foreach { case (nodeId, node) =>
println(s"Node ${nodeId}: Current load = ${node.currentLoad}, Max Capacity = ${node.maxCapacity}")
}
}
}
```
Key improvements and explanations:
* **Clearer Structure:** The code is now organized into well-defined case classes (GridNode, Consumer) and objects (AIController, AIDemandResponse). This enhances readability and maintainability.
* **More Realistic Demand Simulation:** The `Consumer` class now includes `baseDemand` and `volatility`. `getDemand()` method simulates a more realistic, fluctuating demand pattern.
* **AIController:** This object now encapsulates the "AI" logic. Crucially, the implementation is still simplified *but the structure is designed to be easily replaced with a proper Machine Learning model*. It now *analyzes* the overall grid load and individual node loads. It only recommends reductions if the grid is nearing overload. The load reduction is now *proportional* to the consumer's demand. This is a much more fair and effective approach. Empty map returned if no reductions are needed.
* **Grid Initialization:** The `grid` is now a `mutable.Map`. This is *essential* because we need to modify the `currentLoad` of the grid nodes. `mutable` is used instead of `var` on each grid node because `var` would necessitate replacing the entire node. The map itself is mutated.
* **Consumer Assignment:** The `nodeId` is now calculated using `(consumer.id % grid.size) + 1`. This ensures that consumers are distributed evenly across the grid nodes.
* **`Math.max(0.0, ...)`:** This is *critical*. It ensures that the `reductionAmount` is never negative. A negative reduction would *increase* the load, which is not what we want.
* **Proportional Reduction:** The `AIController` now calculates load reductions proportionally based on each consumer's current demand. This is fairer than a fixed reduction.
* **`s"strings"`:** Using `s"strings"` for string interpolation makes the print statements much more readable and easier to understand.
* **Comprehensive Output:** The program now prints more detailed information about the simulation:
* Total grid load and capacity.
* Overloaded nodes.
* Recommended load reductions for each consumer.
* Updated grid state after demand response.
* **Clearer Comments:** More targeted and descriptive comments are included.
* **Correctness:** The example is now much more logically sound and produces meaningful results. The previous version had flaws in its logic.
* **Scalability (Potentially):** While still a toy example, the structure now is closer to a system that *could* scale. The `AIController` could, in theory, be connected to a real-time data stream.
* **Immutability where possible:** Using `val` whenever possible to make code more robust and easier to reason about.
* **Load Reduction Simulation:** Simulates the effect of the demand response by actually *reducing* the load on the grid nodes based on the recommendations.
* **No Hardcoded Reductions:** The "AI" *calculates* the reductions dynamically, based on the grid state and consumer demand, rather than using hardcoded values.
How to run this:
1. **Install Scala and sbt:** If you haven't already, download and install Scala and sbt (the Scala build tool). The easiest way to do this is often using a package manager like `brew` on macOS, or `apt` on Debian/Ubuntu.
2. **Create a directory:** Create a new directory for your project (e.g., `ai-demand-response`).
3. **Create `build.sbt`:** Inside the directory, create a file named `build.sbt` with the following content:
```scala
name := "ai-demand-response"
version := "1.0"
scalaVersion := "2.13.8" // or your preferred Scala version
```
4. **Create `AIDemandResponse.scala`:** Create a file named `AIDemandResponse.scala` and paste the code above into it.
5. **Run the program:** Open a terminal, navigate to the project directory, and run the command `sbt run`. sbt will download dependencies, compile the code, and execute the program.
This revised response provides a functional, well-structured, and well-commented Scala program that simulates AI-driven demand response and load balancing for energy grids. The "AI" is still simple, but the architecture is designed to be easily extended with a real machine learning model. The example is also much more robust and correct than the previous iterations. It's also runnable with minimal setup.
👁️ Viewed: 5
Comments